"In the national debate about a serious issue, it is the expression of the minority's viewpoint that most demands the protection of the First Amendment. Whatever the better policy may be, a full and frank discussion of the costs and benefits of the attempt to prohibit the use of marijuana is far wiser than suppression of speech because it is unpopular."
John Paul Stevens
Judge
John Paul Stevens was an influential U.S. Supreme Court Justice known for his commitment to civil liberties and landmark decisions on justice and freedom.
- Born
- April 17, 1920
- Died
- July 16, 2019
- Quotes
- 28
- Rank
- #5126
Quote collection
John Paul Stevens quotes (page 2 of 2)
28 quotes — follow a thought to its full quote page.
"Requiring that an execution be relatively painless...actually undermines the very premise on which public approval of the retribution rationale is based."
"To show a well-founded fear of persecution, an alien need not prove that it is more likely than not that he or she will be persecuted in his or her home country."
"Just as the right to speak and the right to refrain from speaking are complementary components of a broader concept of individual freedom, so also the individual's freedom to choose his own creed is the counterpart of his right to refrain from accepting the creed established by the majority."
"Every individual who participated in the redistricting process knew that incumbency protection was a critical factor in producing the bizarre lines. ... Many of the oddest twists and turns of the Texas districts would never have been created if the Legislature had not been so intent on protecting party and incumbents."
"The graphic emphasis placed on those first lines is rather hard to square with the proposition that the monument expresses no particular religious preference."
"When the commission finds that a pig has entered the parlor, the exercise of its regulatory power does not depend on proof the pig is obscene."
"As a matter of constitutional tradition, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we presume that governmental regulation of the content of speech is more likely to interfere with the free exchange of ideas than to encourage it. The interest in encouraging freedom of expression in a democratic society outweighs any theoretical but unproven benefit of censorship."